First of all, Bogle's “costs matter” hypothesis really put into the central kind of focus for us that it’s costs that matter. We run active funds, we run index funds, and Bogle launched more active funds during his tenure than all of his successors combined. But what we really see opportunity in is to be able to help investors keep more of what they earn. So we certainly see opportunities of that in index. And you saw that in a large portion of the cost reductions we announced today, but also last year.
But if I can just underscore, costs matter in active management as well. And so if you just take an example of our fixed income or our active fixed income, you know, we charge 11 basis points for our active fixed income; 88% of our active fixed income outperforms its peers over a 10-year period. And that’s not a coincidence.
What it means is that because we have a lower fee hurdle to overcome, it allows our investors to be much more disciplined about the investments that they’re making, the risks that they’re taking, whether it’s around credit, whether it’s around rates. And that’s how our teams are able to put up kind of numbers like 88% outperforming over a 10-year period.
And so we think the underlying piece is really that costs matter. There are a lot of people that come on this show that talk about performance, but if you look at one of the biggest predictors of long-term performance in active management as well as in index management, it really is about the cost you charge.
And you know, Bogle had a great line, which I'll repeat, which is that in investing, “You get what you don’t pay for.” And that’s been true in active, and that’s been true in index, and it’s something that we believe really quite firmly here at Vanguard.