Market turbulence hits

In early April, tariffs roiled financial markets, presenting an opportunity to study whether ETFs performed better than the same securities traded outside the ETF vehicle. The first nine trading days of April were particularly intense. According to Bloomberg:

  • Equity trading volumes reached a 10-year high on April 9.
  • The CBOE Volatility Index surged by about 140% from April 1 to April 11.
  • The MOVE Index, which measures U.S. bond market volatility, spiked by nearly 40% over the same period, hitting a 12-month high of 139.88 on April 8.
Volatility’s impact on ETF spreads

During times of heightened volatility, ETF bid-ask spreads tend to widen because of price uncertainty. This can increase transaction costs for investors who choose to trade during these periods.

Despite the volatility, Vanguard ETFs demonstrated remarkable resilience. Although bid-ask spreads widened in April, they remained significantly lower for the ETFs than for the underlying securities in their portfolios. Bid-ask spreads for ETFs’ underlying securities are typically larger than ETF spreads. Even at the height of the tumult in early April, this relationship held true, underscoring the cost efficiency of the ETF structure.

 At peak volatility, Vanguard ETF spreads rose only by an average of about 4 basis points (bps)—from 2 bps to 6 bps—while spreads for the baskets they represent rose an average of 12 bps—from 16 bps to 28 bps. (One basis point equals one one-hundredth of a percentage point.)[1]

As volatility spiked, ETF spreads offered relative stability
As volatility spiked, ETF spreads offered relative stability

Notes: The bid-ask spread for all 91 Vanguard ETFs is calculated using the average daily spread for each Vanguard ETF weighted by the notional value traded. Basket spread represents the spread of the underlying basket using the same weighting.

Source: Bloomberg, as of April 11, 2025.

Vanguard’s capital markets team has continuously developed disciplined processes and innovated to ensure the best pricing execution for our clients.

More than one way to price an ETF

To trade effectively, investors need to be aware of the different ways ETFs are priced. One key metric is the net asset value (NAV), which, as with mutual funds, represents the assessed or fair value of an ETF’s underlying securities.[2] However, unlike mutual funds, ETFs do not transact at NAV. Instead, ETF investors buy and sell at market prices, which are determined by supply and demand. As a result, an ETF’s market price can diverge from its NAV.

The stability of average premium or discount

NAV and market price may differ for all types of ETFs, but the effect can be more pronounced for fixed income ETFs. In normal market conditions, fixed income ETFs often trade at modest premiums. However, at the beginning of April 2025, discounts for fixed income ETFs were significantly larger than usual.

These discounts arise from the differences in how the market prices ETFs and how pricing vendors calculate NAVs. Market makers’ ETF quotes typically reflect the current value at which the underlying bonds can be traded. In contrast, NAV valuations rely on various inputs, often based on backward-looking pricing methods. For this reason, ETFs’ market prices often reflect underlying market conditions more quickly than NAVs, making them valuable tools for price discovery.

The pricing disparity, known as a fixed income ETF’s perceived discount, is particularly noticeable in times of volatility. The level of these price differences in early April 2025 was similar to what markets experienced in other turbulent periods, such as March 2020 (at the start of the pandemic).

Average premiums/discounts for U.S. fixed income ETFs
Average premiums/discounts for U.S. fixed income ETFs

Note: The figure shows average daily premiums and discounts for U.S.-domiciled fixed income ETFs that had assets under management valued at $1 billion or more.

Source: Bloomberg.

When an ETF is trading at a premium or discount, investors should dig into the details. ETFs with relatively stable premiums and discounts are more likely to deliver better trading results for investors.

Best practices when markets swing dramatically

In times of market volatility, sometimes the smartest trade is no trade at all. However, there are instances when investors need to buy or sell, such as to meet wash-sale rules or raise cash.

“Fortunately, understanding best practices for trading ETFs can help investors reduce transaction costs and improve their outcomes even when markets swing dramatically,” said Patrick Hooper, Vanguard senior specialist, ETF Capital Markets.

These best practices include:

  • Using marketable limit orders. Instead of market orders, opt for marketable limit orders. These are limit orders placed slightly above the ask or offer when buying and slightly below the best bid when selling. They enable greater price control than market orders, while still providing trading flexibility.
  • Being cautious at market open and close. ETF prices can fluctuate more during these periods; allowing some time to pass before trading in the morning and completing large trades well before closing can give investors more control over pricing.
  • Trading international ETFs during local market hours. For international ETFs, trading during the local market hours of the underlying securities can lead to better results.
  • Seeking expert help when needed. When in doubt, call for help. Your custodian’s block/high-touch desk or the issuer’s capital markets team can provide valuable support.
  • Taking advantage of the benefits that Vanguard ETFs offer over competitors’ products.

“Volatility in the markets is inevitable, but the ETF vehicle continues to shine in all market conditions,” said David Sharp, Vanguard director, ETF Capital Markets. “ETFs may trade at wider spreads or at perceived discounts to fair value, a cost imposed by trading in turbulent markets. But even when that happens, ETFs continue to be ideal vehicles for many investors, especially those who are particularly sensitive to price discovery and trading costs. ETFs often deliver better outcomes for these investors than baskets of individual securities.”

 

[1] Spreads for all 91 Vanguard ETFs and their baskets of underlying securities are as of April 11, 2025.

[2] Certain funds may apply a fair value pricing methodology that will set the NAV at different levels than the underlying securities’ official closing value.

 

Notes:

For more information about Vanguard funds and ETFs, visit vanguard.com to obtain a prospectus or, if available, a summary prospectus. Investment objectives, risks, charges, expenses, and other important information are contained in the prospectus; read and consider it carefully before investing.

Vanguard ETF Shares are not redeemable with the issuing Fund other than in very large aggregations worth millions of dollars. Instead, investors must buy and sell Vanguard ETF Shares in the secondary market and hold those shares in a brokerage account. In doing so, the investor may incur brokerage commissions and may pay more than net asset value when buying and receive less than net asset value when selling.

Investments in bonds are subject to interest rate, credit, and inflation risk.

All investing is subject to risk, including possible loss of principal. Be aware that fluctuations in the financial markets and other factors may cause declines in the value of a client’s account. There is no guarantee that any particular asset allocation or mix of funds will meet a client’s investment objectives or provide the client with a given level of income. Diversification does not ensure a profit or protect against a loss.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. 

©2025 The Vanguard Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Vanguard Marketing Corporation, Distributor. 

Bloomberg® and Bloomberg Indexes mentioned herein are service marks of Bloomberg Finance LP and its affiliates, including Bloomberg Index Services Limited (“BISL”), the administrator of the index (collectively, “Bloomberg”) and have been licensed for use for certain purposes by Vanguard. Bloomberg is not affiliated with Vanguard and Bloomberg does not approve, endorse, review, or recommend the Financial Products included in this document. Bloomberg does not guarantee the timeliness, accurateness or completeness of any data or information related to the Financial Products included in this document.

Vanguard Mexico is not responsible for and does not prepare, edit, or endorse the content, advertising, products, or other materials on or available from any website owned or operated by a third party that may be linked to this email/document via hyperlink.  The fact that Vanguard Mexico has provided a link to a third party's website does not constitute an implicit or explicit endorsement, authorization, sponsorship, or affiliation by Vanguard with respect to such website, its content, its owners, providers, or services.  You shall use any such third-party content at your own risk and Vanguard Mexico is not liable for any loss or damage that you may suffer by using third party websites or any content, advertising, products, or other materials in connection therewith.